Obama’s Big
Mistake
The View from the Middle
Back in 2009, Barack Obama
was ushered into the White House with a 79-vote majority in the House of
Representatives and a filibuster proof majority of 60 votes in the Senate when
you include the two so called Independents who caucused with the
Democrats. He read this as a mandate by
the people to embrace his far left ideology when it might have been more of a
rejection by the people of the performance of a two term sitting
President. Sound familiar? I don’t believe that George W. Bush deserves
all the blame for the financial collapse of 2008, but he has to bear part of
it.
Obama was confident. I would say cocky. He assumed that the world had fundamentally
changed and that he would always enjoy the advantages he inherited. So, he told Republicans to “drop dead” in
three different ways during the first two years in office. First, he humiliated John McCain, Eric Canter
and John Boehner by telling them in a very public fashion that “elections have
consequences, and I won”. This would hardly
be described as being magnanimous in victory.
During the mid-term
campaigning in 2010, he gave speeches ridiculing Republicans. He created an analogy that compared the US
economy to a car in a ditch. He
suggested that he and the Democrats had dragged this car back onto the road
with no help from Republicans. You can
argue the accuracy of the analogy, but the insult that followed was unnecessary. In terms of moving forward, he said
Republicans could, “come along for the ride, but they gotta sit in the back
seat.” As you can imagine, Black
Republican leaders were particularly offended.
Finally, not
chronologically but in terms of the intensity of the rejection, President Obama
passed his signature legislation, Obamacare, without a single Republican vote
in either house of Congress. In a bill
that was close to 3,000 pages long, he couldn’t include one conservative
compromise idea, like tort reform or selling insurance across state lines, to
cobble together a few Republican votes? This would have at least given some appearance of bipartisanship?
This hardline rejection of
roughly half of America led to what Obama described as a “shellacking” in the
2010 midterms. But he didn’t learn any
lessons. He proceeded to use Stalag Commandant
Harry Reid to suppress any possibility of conservative ideas seeing the light
of day in the Senate. Republicans were
allowed no bills to be debated and no amendments to Democrat bills. Even as the ship was sinking, he would not
seek consensus, which could have bailed him out.
Then, when he lost the
Senate in the 2014 midterms, rather than reach across the aisle, he boasted
that he “had a pen and a phone”. He now
planned to run the country as a monarchy through executive orders. He has no compromise in his blood and this
final attempt to dismiss the will of the people has cost him and his party the
White House.
Now, he is about to learn
a hard lesson. In politics, if you run
the country in a savagely partisan fashion and without any consensus, everything
you put into place can be undone with the same stroke of a pen you used. I get no joy out of writing these words, but
I write them in the hope that Donald Trump won’t make this same mistake.
Mr. Trump inherits a
similar situation to Mr. Obama’s. While
he doesn’t have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, he will find a more
pliable minority opposition since 25 of the 33 Senate seats up for reelection
in 2018 will be from the Democrat Caucus.
My hope is that Mr. Trump will reach out to the other side and find
solutions that garner bipartisan support and will work for the American
people. Let me give you a few examples
of some fertile compromise positions.
On immigration, the vast
majority of Americans are in favor of better border security. Mr. Trump should deliver on his campaign
promise to secure our southern border, whatever that looks like. Most Americans, if not all, are in favor of
sending illegal alien felons back to where they came from. Do it!
For the remaining, law-abiding Hispanic citizens (other than the fact
that they are here illegally) we must offer them a path to legalization (not
citizenship). I wouldn’t even be so
foolish as to suggest that they pay back taxes.
What a mess that would be. They should
pay a small fine, get legalized and then we can all put this nagging problem
behind us. Even a $100 fine would bring
in a billion dollars, which we can put towards border security.
On Obamacare, there are
some popular elements in the FCA. I
agree that the total law is a disaster waiting to happen, but as one of my old
bosses used to say, “don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.”
Term limits is another
area where President Elect Trump can find broad consensus, if not with members
of Congress, with the American people.
75% of Americans are in favor of term limits and a President Trump could
use his bully pulpit to bully congressmen and women to support a constitutional
amendment to impose limits on themselves.
There are other areas
where there is bipartisan support. My
hope is that a new President Trump would not make the same mistake that
President Obama did, and reach out to the other side of the aisle to bring
Americans together and to move America forward.
Early signs are good, but we have a long way to go and many wounds to
heal.
This is spot on--well said. One thought: GWB may have played a small part in the 08 financial crisis but a host of others (legislators, cabinet members, bankers, mortgage companies and more) did the real damage. All the Devils Are Here by Bethany Mclean and Joe Nocera has the details.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree, Chuck. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Franklin Raines and even Bill Clinton come to mind. Remember, the epicenter of the meltdown was the Community Reinvestment Act.
DeleteWell thought out Kevin.I do hope that President Trump will try to pass good legislation through compromise.I also hope that people understand the elections do have consequences.
ReplyDeleteAmen, Johnny.
Delete