Wednesday, August 18, 2021

Botched

 The View from the Middle

 

While I disagree with almost all of Joe Biden’s policies, there are three critically important areas where he has made, “unforced errors”, and that is according to senior Obama administration officials.  I disagree, for example with President Biden’s decision to abandon the Keystone Pipeline, while allowing Russia to complete its Nord Stream 2 pipeline to Germany.  I disagree with his decision to reengage with Iran, the world’s largest sponsor of terror, which included financial support and reengagement in the impotent nuclear deal.  I also disagree with rejoining the Paris Global Warming Accord, and I have published pieces that explain my positions on all of these policy decisions.  We can debate all of these strategic choices, but there are three layups (a basketball term for an easy shot) that Joe has blown that even his most sycophantic followers are beginning to question.

First, there is President Biden’s handling of our southern border.  While he can claim that he inherited this problem, the facts on the ground do not support that assertion.  In Trump’s final year we averaged about 35,000 border apprehensions per month and for all four of the Trump administration years we averaged about 40,000 per month.  This was because of policies like “Stay in Mexico”, the elimination of catch and release and Title 42 expulsions which allowed Border Control to return illegal immigrants due to exposure to covid-19.  Joe Biden decided to reverse all of those effective policies and since we have been averaging almost 200,000 apprehensions per month and we are headed for a two million apprehension year for 2021.  Plus, who knows how many people are not being apprehended.  These are called “got-aways”, and are the most dangerous illegal entries for obvious reasons.  Border Patrol is projecting that we will experience 500,000 of these “got-aways” this year.  Joe Biden could have and should have just done nothing which is what makes his handling of the border a total botch.

Next, we have the Biden Administration’s handling of the Coronavirus vaccine implementation.  Despite the fact that President Biden tried to suggest that the vaccine didn’t exist before he became President, the truth is that it was developed in record time by the Trump administration and Joe received his first shot in December of 2020.  Joe’s job was simply to get the vaccine shots into the arms of the American people.  

Joe and Kamala, in their thirst to be elected, began to sow the seeds of distrust of the vaccine way back during the Democrat primary when they both indicated that they wouldn’t trust or take a vaccine developed under the Trump administration.  Then, when they took office, they obviously had no idea what was going on.  Joe promised that he was going to get “a million shots per day” into American arms.  Then, someone on his staff reminded him that the Trump administration was already ahead of that pace before they left office.  This lack of awareness did not inspire confidence in the American people and resulted in an immediate drop in that daily vaccination rate. 

Finally, Joe could have gone on a campaign to build trust in the vaccine and thus convince the American people to get vaccinated.  He and his administration, unfortunately, chose to shame and demonize the American people who were hesitant to get vaccinated.  There has been a big miss with black Americans who, for good reason, harbor a mistrust of big government. Only about 30% of US blacks have gotten the shots compared to a 60% level for all of our citizens.  He could have given the previous administration some due credit and pursued a positive message, but he didn’t.  This could have been easy, but he blew it and dramatically missed his goal.

And now we have our withdrawal from Afghanistan.  To be fair, I’m not going to blame Joe for getting us into Afghanistan, although he was part of a unanimous vote in the Senate to fund our actions there.  I won’t even blame him for staying there beyond accomplishing our initial mission, which probably happened in 2002, even though he was Vice President for eight of the last 20 years.  There are plenty of people, Democrat and Republican alike, who can take credit for all of those mistakes.  But Joe must take full responsibility for botching the very tactical withdrawal.

Most of us are not politicians or diplomats or four-star generals, but we do have brains and some common sense.  Common sense would suggest that you should not give your enemy a firm timetable of your withdrawal with no connection to conditions on the ground.  Common sense would tell you NOT to execute that withdrawal during the peak “fighting season” of your enemy.  Common sense would suggest that you have over half of your withdrawal of equipment and personnel completed before you tell your enemy anything.  Common sense would tell you not to remove the military before you remove American citizens and Afghan collaborators.  President Biden decided to ignore all of that common-sense advice and now must own the carnage that is about to ensue.

The Taliban is going door-to-door right now to find the Afghan men who cooperated with us and they are looking for women to become their sex slaves.  The next month will be brutal in Afghanistan.  There will be blood in streets, and that will be just the beginning of the suffering and dehumanization for the women there.  The good news for Joe Biden is that the Taliban are not the most transparent people so the world will probably not see much of the savagery.

And finally, this will impact our foreign policy for years to come.  What ally will trust us in the future (think South Korea, Taiwan and Israel) and our enemies will not fear us and will see this as an opportunity to take advantage.  How many terrorists can cross our southern border over the next few months, and how much damage can they do here.

All of these were unforced errors.  That’s three layups missed in just six months.  Joe, if I were your coach, you would be benched.  

31 comments:

  1. It always amazes me how the border flows rise and fall with the economy, and Republicans crow every year about doing this or that when they're in power, and bitch no one is doing anything when they're out, but they truly have zero real policy to do anything about it. Kevin, I've heard your proposals and they're good ones. But it's pointless. The last comprehensive attempt to address the border was actually a Republican idea - GWB's. His own party killed it. There's too much good press in hammering immigrants for them.

    Funny thing is your ideas are great, but you're illustrating why they don't get traction. Because you'll blast Dems even why your party does nothing even under one of its own. So again, the GOP keeps your vote without having to actually do anything!

    If Biden had literally done nothing, we'd have surges, and Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz and the rest of the clown show would be putting on vests and doing photo ops and saying literally the same thing they are now. How do we know? Because they have done literally the same thing every time a Democrat is President, regardless of the numbers. Obama actually grew the Border Patrol more than Bush, but it didn't matter. Same old theater.

    To call the immigration issue a "layup" for any President is to ignore basically everything since Reagan got his reform effort passed decades ago. You're just looking for partisan talking points.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Trump had been elected, we would not have had any surges. Remember the Biden t-shirts that were being worn by the early illegal immigrants? Trump was closing the border and Biden is actually encouraging illegals to come across the border and bringing Covid and the Deltal variant with them. Closing the border was a layup, and Biden Blew it.

      On a different subject, I have written about resolving the issue of people who are already here. First, we have to secure our southern border. Second, we should create a pathway to citizenship for the dreamers (kids who came with adults across the border before they could have known what was going on - 2,3,4,5 year olds, etc). Third, we need to create a path to legalization for the rest of the 10 to 20 million illegals who are here now. Legalization does NOT include the right to vote. Multiple administrations have botched this opportunity, but that is the solution. Both parties would rather have the issue to leverage than the solution that most Americans believe in.

      Delete
  2. "when they both indicated that they wouldn’t trust or take a vaccine developed under the Trump administration."

    This is false. What Harris said was she wouldn't trust Trump ALONE on vaccines and would seek a credible source. What's wrong with this? You, a Trump voter, wouldn't trust Trump alone to even sell you a used car. You'd still want the mechanic. You wouldn't sign up for a course at Trump U, and you wouldn't give to a charity run by Donald Trump. Not trusting Trump ALONE is basic common sense and has been for decades before he became President.

    So start with being truthful.

    "He could have given the previous administration some due credit and pursued a positive message, but he didn’t. This could have been easy, but he blew it and dramatically missed his goal."

    Can you link me to his goal? It's crazy, you're completely pretending Trump and the GOP has no role in vaccine hesitancy. That is literally nuts. Sure, there's a hard "left" anti-vax movement, as Robert Kennedy illustrates, and has been for some time. But to say that Biden is to blame because Trump voters aren't getting vaccinated is truly crazytown.

    How do you execute a "layup" with people who don't even believe you are the legitimate President? And the guy they do believe is legit won't even do a PSA encouraging to get vaccinated? And you blame Biden for this?

    I want some of what you're smoking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are making me laugh. You think it is Trump voters that are causing Biden to miss his goals when 70% of Black America is not vaccinated. Demonizing Trump and anyone who hesitates to get vaccinated is not the answer. Creating the vaccine in 10 months was Herculean, getting into people's arms was a layup, and he blew it.

      Delete
    2. What goals are you speaking of? You keep saying he didn’t meet them. Can you link to them?

      60% of Arkansas is unvaccinated. Are you saying that’s Biden’s fault?

      I’m not demonizing anyone. Just not sure what goals you’re claiming are missed.

      Delete
  3. "Common sense would suggest that you should not give your enemy a firm timetable of your withdrawal with no connection to conditions on the ground. Common sense would tell you NOT to execute that withdrawal during the peak “fighting season” of your enemy. Common sense would suggest that you have over half of your withdrawal of equipment and personnel completed before you tell your enemy anything. Common sense would tell you not to remove the military before you remove American citizens and Afghan collaborators. President Biden decided to ignore all of that common-sense advice and now must own the carnage that is about to ensue."

    If all of this is common sense why did you say nothing when this was negotiated?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/08/remembering-the-shameful-trump-taliban-peace-agreement/?taid=611bac7eeb33530001737b62&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

    You want to blast Biden for the withdrawal, go ahead. It might be premature, given that we're only a couple days in, so be careful. But sure. You just might want to wait until we see if all Americans get out safely, and all our partners get it out. You say the "carnage" will ensue - what carnage are you talking about? Do you mean against Afghan citizens? If so, how long were you willing to stay to prevent it, because Biden actually stayed longer than the Trump timeline.

    Oh, and don't forget this gem:

    https://twitter.com/theNuzzy/status/1427051039404957697

    Or this gem from the RNC that they've scrubbed from their website:

    https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1427018983379640323?s=20

    Afghanistan has been a bipartisan screwup from day one. If you're trying to play partisan politics with it after twenty years, you're part of why we ended up here 20 years later. Everyone was afraid to give the American people a sober, realistic statement of what was going on because it would blow up the narrative of their team/my team and there'd be accusations of not believing in America etc. because slogans are better than hard truths for being reelected. This article gets it about right with where we are as a people and the politicians we have as a result:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/08/afghanistan-your-fault/619769/

    To call Afghanistan a "layup" is just nuts and honestly sad. "Very tactical" withdrawal. What does that even mean?

    Rather than play partisan games with a result decades in the making, you might want to encourage your GOP brethren to welcome the refugees to help avoid the carnage. The Utah GOP governor has been a breath of fresh air on this, but the right wing media ecosystem is already pivoting to "we don't want these people."

    In short, rise above the partisanship and hold your team to the standard you hold the other. America will be better for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt,
      I'm not going to address all of your defense of Biden's actions that even his most sycophantic followers are calling "a catastrophe". But let me correct some you your misstatements above.

      I didn't call the 20 year experience in Afghanistan a layup. There are many two blame for that, but the withdrawal is a layup and it has been botched. Again, just listen to Biden's biggest fans agreeing with that.

      And we have already seen the carnage. Women have already been murdered for not wearing their Burqas. The Taliban is going door to door right now, and they are not doing so to hand out care packages. Women will be murdered and raped and men will be killed if they are left behind. You can bet on it, and if you think differently, you are just being delusional.

      Separately, we can debate what we should have done in Afghanistan from the beginning, but where we have been for the last 18 months was not a bad place. No one knows what would have happened if Trump had won the election - Not even you. But I will be glad to have that discussion with you over lunch. You're buying this time.

      BTW - I totally agree with "Ranch Antics" below.

      Delete
    2. Of course you're not. Because to do so might end up with you criticizing the Trump-Taliban deal you'd forgot about.

      Absolutely people are going to be killed when the Taliban takes over. Yet strangely, under the Trump plan, which he announced to great fanfare and even bragged that Biden couldn't stop if he wanted to, you said nothing about this upcoming carnage. Even when Trump released 5000 captured Taliban, you said nothing. Now you can't talk about the bloodshed enough. Why so silent then?

      As far as "rookie mistakes" how does one get experience in evacuating us from this sort of thing? Right now we are processing 500 people an hour, so far no Americans have died in the evacuation, and the airport is secure and flights are taking off regularly. So whatever mistakes were made with regard to the evacuation, it appears they're rectified. Isn't that what we want from our leaders - to learn from their mistake? I'm guessing if at the end of this we get all Americans out safely, and a bunch of refugees who help us, you won't mention it, because goodness forbid you have to say something actually worked under a Democrat.

      I'm a little confused at this point. You say where we've been the last 18 months wasn't a bad place? We were there because Trump had already committed us to leave in May. Biden just extended it a little. Trump was quite proud of his accomplishment. I sent you the links of him bragging about it. Are you just pretending that agreement didn't happen? That he didn't say those things? Or do you believe the Taliban just had such great respect for Trump they wouldn't oppress women and kill people once Trump released 5000 of their worst and pulled all the troops out? Seriously - read the McCarthy National Review article linked above if you're unfamiliar with the deal. I don't even agree with McCarthy on whether we should stay, but you can't claim he's some wild-eyed liberal.

      What is your criticism of Biden at this point? That the first day went poorly, though no Americans were killed in the evacuation? It seems to just be "well, he's a Democrat and I don't like him."

      Don't be a reflexive partisan.

      And I'll buy lunch every time!

      Delete
    3. I did't forget Trump's deal, but what YOU forget is two things. First it was targeted to be executed outside the "fighting season". Second, it was tied to "conditions on the ground". You are amazing. Rather than accept the fact that Biden blew all of these issues as even his previous worshippers at CNN, The NYT and even MSDNC have (calling this a catastrophe and a global embarrassment), you try to continue to somehow criticize Trump. You have no idea what Trump would have done to avoid this situation. What you are suggesting is total fantasy. You think that YOU "KNOW" what would have happened if Trump was President. Give it up, Matt. I think they have pills now for Trump Derangement Syndrome. Go get some. He's been out of office for seven months now and out of power for nearly a year. You just hate Trump because you think he is a jerk. I would take his policies right now over Joe Biden's in almost every area, and I think we would not be in this mess if he was still President. Neither of us can "prove" what we "think" would have happened if he was still President. He could have called the whole thing off if conditions on the ground dictated. He certainly would have at least listened to his military advisers who Biden has overruled time after time in Afghanistan. But enough about what Trump might have done or might not have done. Biden is President now and the buck stops with him, after he threw everyone else under the bus including Trump and the Afghan military who have lost almost 60,000 men in combat.

      And Joe is still lying to the American people. Yesterday on his interview with his buddy George Snuffleupagus, Joe said, "Thank God no one has died". Are you kidding me? People are falling from airplanes. Women are being murdered in the streets for not wearing a burka. He's either stupid, incompetent or a liar, or all three. He also said, "there was no way to leave without chaos." Interestingly, that's not what he said back in July. Back then he said the Taliban weren't capable of taking over the country and this was going to be a snap. You can't have it both ways. Did he forget that we have recording devices in the 21st century?

      Just accept the fact the everyone but you is calling this a disaster. And it's been more than "one day" as you suggest. It has been 12 days of embarrassment so far and Joe was on vacation for most of it, and won't answer questions when he does peak out of his bunker. Are you suggesting that he has instilled confidence in the last week. He bumbles through his prepared (by someone else) speeches on a single teleprompter (because he can't handle multiple teleprompters any more) and then turns his back and hightails it out of the room.

      I'm not a partisan. I'm a realist. Come join us.

      I'll eat every time! Name the place and time.

      Delete
    4. "First it was targeted to be executed outside the "fighting season"

      How would that have changed anything? Taliban to my knowledge hasn't attacked Americans during this evacuation.

      "Second, it was tied to "conditions on the ground".

      No it wasn't. Trump was getting out, as he'd said he would do for years. I'm not even criticizing him for that. But let's not pretend he wasn't going to do what he'd always said he would, what he released 5000 Taliban to get to do, and what he bragged about being unstoppable regardless of what Biden did.

      To pretend otherwise is just partisan blinders talking.

      "You are amazing."

      I get that a lot.

      "Rather than accept the fact that Biden blew all of these issues"

      Again - what issues? I can't seem to get what exactly you're criticizing here.

      "You think that YOU "KNOW" what would have happened if Trump was President. "

      I don't think I know anything. I'm literally telling you what TRUMP said. Repeatedly. On video. In an agreement he widely touted and said no one could stop. If you want to argue he was lying, be my guest.

      "He certainly would have at least listened to his military advisers who Biden has overruled time after time in Afghanistan."

      This makes no sense because his military advisers didn't like the Afghanistan deal. Again, read the McCarthy article. Trump repeatedly fired military advisers when he got information he didn't like.

      I can't tell - are you saying we should have stayed? If so, for how long and with how many troops and with what mission? If you're going to be a critic, don't be one who doesn't put their own position up to scrutiny.

      "People are falling from airplanes. Women are being murdered in the streets for not wearing a burka."

      So am I to understand that it's Biden's fault Afghans whom you don't know held on to a plane as it was taking off? Really?

      I understand women are being killed, and there will be much more devastation and slaughter. So again, what would you have us do?

      "It has been 12 days of embarrassment so far"

      What are you embarrassed about? No Americans being killed? 500 people an hour being evacuated? I'm serious - what did you think it would look like when we handed power of a third world country over to the Taliban, which was set in motion almost 2 years ago? Did you think it was going to look like XNA on a slow day? Really, what did you envision us leaving would look like based on the history of powerful Western nations leaving a third world country with a centuries long history of tribal warfare?

      It was always going to be ugly when we left, especially in light of the fact we were going to leave people who left us behind. In no small part because we have a strong anti-refugee sentiment here right now. And for the life of me I can't figure out why the Trump Admin was slow-walking visa for those who assisted us. Can you?

      For a realist, you seem to have tons of partisan criticisms, but very few actual statements on YOUR policy, or what YOU expected to see. Let's hold those up to the light.

      "Are you suggesting that he has instilled confidence in the last week."

      I'm suggesting that the idea of whether a politician "instills confidence" is somewhat of a silly notion. Those who hate him will continue to hate him, those who like him will continue to like him. He could pay for the best ice cream in the world out of his own pocket and hand deliver it in a waffle cone to your door, and you'd find something about it to dislike. That's politics.

      Shogun next week?

      Delete
  4. What truly shocks me about the Biden Administration is the large number of Rookie mistakes they make, especially after we were all told that we needed to get a trusted and experienced, even-handed leader who would help heal all of us after those "terrible" Trump years....that's not working out so well for any of us right now, is it?!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also, when you're expressing your sympathy for those Afghans subjected to the carnage, you might want to remember this and wonder why you didn't speak up then.

    https://www.npr.org/2019/05/01/718927688/no-visas-for-afghan-and-iraqi-interpreters

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-admin-broke-law-visa-delays-afghans-iraqis-who-worked-n1057846

    Also remember your stories of carnage when the GOP starts pushing back against accepting refugees from Afghanistan, as it will. Will you call up your Arkansas members of Congress, who are all GOP, and demand they help these people avoid the bloodshed and carnage you speak of by letting them in the United States?

    That's the test - is your rhetoric just for partisan points, or do you truly mean it and demand your team act to prevent it?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here's a good criticism of the Biden plan:

    https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1427722146856456196?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Bagram is something that should have been in my article, but I found that a total explanation as to how important that airfield is would have made my article way too long. And this criticism is from a Democrat at heart and member of Nancy Pelosi's Jan. 6 sham of a committee. Has he officially changed parties yet? : - )

      Delete
    2. The counterpoint to that I've read is that Bagram is out in the middle of nowhere, and it would have been difficult for Afghans to make it safely.

      Kinzinger is a Democrat at heart? I have to ask - at this point what beyond loyalty to Trump defines being a Republican? Seriously - how do YOU identify a Republican in terms of policy?

      IF it's a sham of a committee? Way to get out in front of any information that comes out. Classic move.

      Delete
    3. Matt,
      You do make me laugh. Are you calling Nancy's committee legitimate? She denied the minority party to pick its own members, a move that was truly unprecedented in our county's history. She (they) are not allowing questions about why requested security was denied.

      ANY Republican who would accept Nancy's invitation to that committee with the restrictions on questions they can ask isn't interested in truth or justice or the ideals of a functioning Republic. Liz Cheney, Kinzinger's committee teammate, can't even win her primary challenge in Wyoming, maybe the most Republican state in the Union, despite her name recognition of family political pedigree. Cheney and Kinzinger both hate Trump and that is the only qualification needed to get on Nancy's committee. Their goal has nothing to do with truth or justice.

      As to your last comment. Nancy's committee's report is already written, by someone else of course. Nancy is 80 years old and doesn't even know what end of the pen to hold. My disdain for that committee has nothing to do with Trump. I would criticize a Republican committee that denied minority rights and denied lines of questioning that the minority party wants to ask.

      Honestly, Matt, if you believe that committee is legitimate, you are willfully ignoring autocratic, even despotic actions at a time when the mandate from the last election should be compromise (75 million votes for Trump, 50-50 split in the Senate and a three vote margin in the House, maybe to smallest majority party advantage in our country's history).

      Delete
    4. Matt,
      One more point about Bagram. You say it's in the middle of nowhere? Check out a map of Afghanistan. Bagram is practically on top of Kabul. It is only 30 miles from Kabul, about the distance between Fayetteville and Bentonville. Brenda and I regularly go to Bentonville just to have dinner. I would not call that remote or unreachable.

      Also, Bagram is a military airport, easier to defend and it has two runways vs the one at Kabul. General Milley admitted that they closed Bagram because he couldn't get authorization for the 600 soldiers it would take to keep it open. We have now sent over 6,000 troops to Afghanistan. That investment of 600 troops looks like a bargain now.

      Common sense would suggest that Biden should have done two no-brainer things. One, he should have started the evacuation process way earlier (or later) out of the fighting season, and in secret. Second, he should have kept both airports open to accomodate the thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of evacuees.

      Delete
    5. On Bagram, again that's just something I had seen as a counter. I won't pretend to be an expert on what's involved in the evacation of Americans from a third world country. However, I would pretend that it's anything like driving from Fayetteville to Bentonville either, though I'm sure Brenda's company would make it more pleasant in either country. You, on the other hand . . . . (I kid)

      Delete
    6. 30 miles is 30 miles. And it's obvious that we don't have any experts in charge of this evacuation. Two airports are better than one for an investment of 600 people. No brainer.

      Delete
    7. So far we've evacuated 20,000 without an American death. I'm curious what metrics you're using to determine success or failure.

      Delete
    8. 30 miles is 30 miles? Drive 30 miles down Hwy 7 then drive from Bentonville to Fayetteville and tell me if you still believe that.

      Delete
  7. "Are you calling Nancy's committee legitimate? She denied the minority party to pick its own members, a move that was truly unprecedented in our county's history."

    I don't know what you mean by "legitimate." It's what I call a weasel word in that it can have a fixed meaning or it can mean whatever the speaker wants it to. At the end of the day we will judge it based on the facts it presents.

    I do agree with not putting a Jim Jordan on there. This should be more serious than that. Jim Jordan isn't really a serious person. But then neither is much of the GOP at this point.

    "Liz Cheney, Kinzinger's committee teammate, can't even win her primary challenge in Wyoming, maybe the most Republican state in the Union, despite her name recognition of family political pedigree. "

    I didn't realize her primary had already occurred. Did I miss it?

    " I would criticize a Republican committee that denied minority rights and denied lines of questioning that the minority party wants to ask."

    The fact that you've already prejudged the result when it's just getting underway speaks volumes.

    " when the mandate from the last election should be compromise"

    On law? Sure. Why would you compromise on letting unserious people be involved with such a serious thing. If P&G called you back in to lead a committee to investigate a serious breach of ethics by a top exec, would you let the exec's babysitter sit on the committee? That's the equivalent of McCarthy's picks were.

    Now, if McCarthy had picked, say, Steve Womack, I would say then that is one that makes sense.

    Really, you'll think the whole thing is illegitimate regardless. But the Republicans will release a minority report blaming ANTIFA or something like that. Then we can get away from talking the politics and look at the facts they rely on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt,
      Come on man! To quote our current President. I didn't say that the primary had already taken place. I said she can't win if she even decides to run. She's polling at 25% in Wyoming. Do you want to place a bet right now that she will win her seat in the House back? I'll be glad to take your money. That was a straw dog statement that was well below your integrity level.

      I'll make another bet. Nancy's committee's report will not even mention lack of security as a contributing factor and it will not mention her name unless it is to congratulate her for some made up reason. Want to take that bet?

      Finally, Antifa may have actually been involved in the Jan. 6th mostly peaceful protest, but they and BLM were totally responsible for a year's worth of riots around the country that caused over $2 billion in damages and 35+ lives lost. And Kamala Harris raised bail money for the miscreants that did all of that. OK, I'm done. Don't bother to respond. I'm just moving on. Let me know where and when you want to buy me lunch.

      Delete
    2. "Do you want to place a bet right now that she will win her seat in the House back? I'll be glad to take your money."

      Nah, I don't ever bet on politics. The nomination for President of a Hollywood/NYC celebrity libertine by the GOP showed me the folly in that. In 2014, if you'd have told me DJT would be nominated as a Republican I would have put every dollar I had down.

      " Nancy's committee's report will not even mention lack of security as a contributing factor and it will not mention her name unless it is to congratulate her for some made up reason."

      I have no idea what it will mention. That's why I'm not prejudging it.

      "And Kamala Harris raised bail money for the miscreants that did all of that."

      She did? This sounds like one of those RNC email blasts that might somewhere have a kernel of truth, but isn't really the story.

      I told you Shogun! Pick a day first week of September.

      Delete
  8. One thing I never got - are you saying Biden should not have ended our presence there? If not, what did you think it should be and for what purpose?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a long answer. Let's talk this over lunch.

      Delete
  9. Sleepy Joe is well on his way to becoming the worst president of my lifetime, and may contend for the worst of all time. There is no defending his ridiculous lack of planning for getting us out of Afghanistan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, so far the evacuation so far of 37,000 people without an American death (so far and God willing continuing) is clearly a disaster.

      And all those State Department warnings for the past 4 months telling Americans to get out of Afghanistan were so foolish:

      https://af.usembassy.gov/security-alert-u-s-embassy-kabul-afghanistan-14/

      But by all means, do not let facts get in your way.

      Delete
  10. Child hunger has dropped 40% from the Trump levels as a result of Biden initiatives.

    ReplyDelete
  11. As of today 88,000 people have been evacuated and a plane is departing every 39 minutes.

    If that matters.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kevin you will like (mostly) this:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/a-defeat-of-choice

    ReplyDelete