Thursday, January 7, 2021

The Tyranny of the Majority

 The Tyranny of the Majority

The View from the Middle

 

Given the recent election results and the plans being announced by the Democrat majority party, we should all pause and reflect on the very underpinnings of our Republic.  The fundamental principle that our nation was founded on was “Freedom”.  Our Founders wanted the freedom to strive for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” without being crushed by an oppressive, overpowering government.  They really wanted to avoid a king, but there were other dangers they feared.  Thomas Jefferson understood that “an elective despotism” can be just as bad or worse than a king, and James Madison feared “an unjust majority” who would impose their will on the rest of the country.

Because of this desire for liberty for “all”, the Constitutional Convention in 1787 was a lesson in compromise.  The concept of a bicameral Congress was a protection for smaller states, which ironically included New York at the time, so that they wouldn’t be dominated by the bigger states who could then force their will upon them.  They created a balance of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches of our government to ensure that no single branch could dominate the others thus subjugate “the people”.

But today, almost 250 years after that Convention, we find ourselves in a position where we have to defend ourselves from “elected despotism” or an “unjust majority” that by all evidence wants to impose their will on the entire country even though their majority is razor thin.  

Let’s look at the facts surrounding this majority party.  First, the Democrats will say that Joe Biden received 80 million votes for President (of course some will say he did not), but what they refuse to admit is the Donald Trump received nearly 75 million votes.  Should they tell those 75 million Americans they will not be heard or even considered?  That certainly was not the intent of our Founders.  In the House, Nancy Pelosi and crew lost over a dozen seats to give her one of the smallest majorities in the House since the two-party system emerged back in 1857.  And of course, the 50-50 split in the Senate could not be closer and has only been this close one other time in our country’s history.  Is this a time for the majority party to force its will on the entire country?  Of course not.

If these results are a mandate for anything, they are a mandate for compromise.  Yet what are the things that the Democrat leadership is talking about.  First, they want to pack the Supreme Court by changing the number of Justices from nine to thirteen.  This would allow Joe Biden to pick four Justices of his preference simultaneously thus shifting the ideological balance in the court from conservative to liberal overnight.  This “court packing” was tried by FDR and rejected and denounced by the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  It would also most likely be spurned by all of the current Justices on the Supreme Court.

They also have plans to “pack the Senate”.  How, you ask, can they do that?  First, they plan to make Washington DC a state, thus giving them two new Senators which they believe will be reliably Democrat since DC is 95% Democrat.  They would look for other ways to tip the scales in their favor like making Guam a state or carving California into multiple states so that it also could deliver more reliable Democrat Senators to Congress.  This is gerrymandering on a national scale and is an attempt to turn the Senate into another House of Representatives which violates the very principles on which our country was founded.

And as if these two moves aren’t bad enough, Nancy Pelosi has already suspended the Motion to Recommit from the House rules and Chuck Schumer is talking about eliminating the Filibuster rule in the Senate.  Both of these rules are intended to provide some leverage to the minority party and have been in practice for over 100 years in each case.  These are purely partisan moves being taken at a time when the country and our government are nearly evenly split, 50-50. 

One of Joe Biden’s campaign promises was that he was going to unite our country, which I actually believe is necessary.  However, all of these political moves are as divisive as they could possibly be.  These actions will not only NOT unite America, but it will rip it apart.  

But this last election HAS delivered a mandate to our government leaders.  The representation in the House and the Senate could not be any more evenly divided and 75 million Americans voted for the conservative candidate for President.  This is not a time to turn a blind eye to half of this country and pass extreme policies through a series of 51 to 50 votes.  It is a time for working together.  It is a time for compromise.  It is a time for wisdom.

Remember also that nothing lasts forever.  12 years ago, Barack Obama had a 60-40 advantage in the Senate and a 257-178 advantage in the House (59% to 41%) but he didn’t try to implement any of these radical partisan measures.  Just eight years later, Donald Trump controlled both Houses of Congress and the White House.  I have confidence that the people of The United States will not easily surrender their freedom.  Liberty is in our DNA and “We the People” will forever rise up to claim it.

6 comments:

  1. Kevin,

    I admire your nerve in calling for compromise as a Republican given:

    https://www.politico.com/story/2010/10/the-gops-no-compromise-pledge-044311 (humorously, you can find Pence in there talking about runaway spending)

    This:

    https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2010/11/04/131069048/sen-mcconnell-insists-one-term-for-obama

    And of course countless others, including the current President claiming Obama wasn't even a legitimate President.

    You're literally arguing "compromise" the day the President you've spent the last 4 years defending is saying he won't even show to the inauguration. The first time that's happened since Andrew Johnson.

    Dems will pass legislation I don't like, I have no doubt, but at this point anyone in the Trump GOP calling for "compromise" or arguing there isn't a "mandate" when the Dems control the House, Senate and White House is just being silly.

    And no, if you're still a Trump supporter, you don't get to give lectures on what unites America or what American principles are. Not after your leader spent the last two months lying to people relentlessly, attacking even his own party, all for his personal glorification and resulting in Wednesday.

    This is a good read on the "we should be heard" line, and it's from a conservative so perhaps you'll take it to heart these next 4 years:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/trump-mob-violence-capitol

    We need a conservative party. We don't need the current GOP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt,
      I guess every conservative is glad that you aren't running America so that you can't take away our right to free speak as you seem to want to do just because I disagree with you.

      I am a conservative and have criticized Trump many times in my articles, but of course you will put your head in the sand and ignore all of those articles. I do support Trump's policies. I approve of his tariffs on China and his handling of Iran, North Korea and Russia. I approve of moving our Israeli embassy to Jerusalem. I applaud the three middle east peace deals just developed. I approve of his handling of the economy, pre and post Covid. I am very concerned about our debt, but there are many hands baking that particular cake. I certainly am supportive of the vaccine the his operation Warp Drive delivered and which is currently being mismanaged by Democrat governors. But he is flawed and you can look up my articles where I point them out.

      But if you think your side is pure, you are deluding yourself. Democrats have never accepted him as President yet you criticize him for contesting this election for about 8 weeks now. Democrats were talking about impeaching him before he even took office. 70 Democrat Congress men and women refused to show up at his inauguration. You told lies about him for over two years calling him a Russian asset (actually, you are still doing it) despite the Mueller investigation (lead by a gang of partisan Democrats) found nothing. Then, even after Nancy Pelosi said you could not have a totally partisan impeachment, you impeached him anyway with the only breaks in party allegiance coming from Democrats supporting Trump.

      And now, after months of violence, arson and murder in the Streets of Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, San Fransisco, Chicago and New York, which Democrats either supported or ignored, you want to blame Trump for a few hours of misbehavior (probably Antifa plants) at the Capitol? It didn't even prevent Congress from doing their job and was unlike the 100 days of chaos in Portland which the mayor seems to have just noticed. Over this last summer there has been over $2 billion done in damages to federal buildings that were breeched, businesses being burned and looted and dozens of murders perpetrated by Antifa and BLM (the organization, not the sentiment) including at least 6 children. Have you publicly denounced those acts and those organizations?

      But your answer is NOT to admit that both sides have contributed to this division in our country. Your answer is to suggest that I don't have the right to express my opinion. Look in the mirror, Matt, and see the ugly face of irrational hatred. There are people in this world that want us all to hate each other, and you are falling fully for their Propaganda. Wake up and admit that it is Washington DC that is broken and maybe our best and only hope is "term limits" (which I have supported in multiple articles) to get rid of the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell and all the other ancient, corrupted politicians who have perverted the roles that they play from our founders original intents.

      As much as I disagree with you positions, I will fight for you to be able to voice them, but your approach is to just silence anyone who disagrees with you. Have you read 1984? Maybe you should.

      Delete
  2. Kevin,

    What has become "conservatism" I would more accurately refer to as "toddlerism." In other words, a faction of the Republican party (of which I was a long time supporter) that thinks simply because they believe something then it must be true, and simply because they want something, they are entitled to have it. I don't know if it's a function of their parents never telling them no, or what, but it's a cancer on the Party and tarnishing the conservative movement.

    The free speech discussion is an excellent example. The Constitution, a conservative's lodestar, does not guarantee me or you or anyone a right not to be silenced period. It guarantees us freedom from GOVERNMENT censorship (with limited exception.) I can't sue ESPN for not publishing my story on why the Hogs will win a NC anymore than I can sue Twitter for not publishing my tweet telling other "patriots" where to meet to storm the Capitol. That's not 1984, that's a basic tenet of what used to be conservatism. A private company can accept or reject your speech on its property.

    As a conservative, I do not understand the "Dems did it first!" argument. Again, that's toddlerism. If something is wrong, then it's wrong, whomever did it first. I'm not going to do it because the other side did it first, for if I do, then I have no standards or principles of my own. They're always subject to what THEY do. I am going to judge myself harder than I judge them, and expect more from myself.

    Toddlerism is embodied in Donald Trump, so it's no surprise that what happened at the Capitol happened. He could not accept a loss, and simply threw a fit for two months. In doing so, he tore down whatever legacy he had, but also his own party. That's the essence of toddlerism - it's all about MEEEEEE!!!!!

    I would never suggest you do not have the RIGHT to express your opinion. I'm disagreeing with its validity in light of recent events. That's not censorship or 1984, that's healthy disagreement by which we both test the quality of our ideas and the facts that underpin them. For example, I find your attack on the Mueller report silly. Robert Mueller is an exemplary man, appointed to high positions by both parties, who in a previous GOP would be lauded. You attack the report not on substance, but by saying it was run by "partisan Democrats." Let's say I agree, but tell me how the SUBSTANCE is wrong. Or for example take tariffs. All evidence points to them being an abject failure, at least on any of the stated goals (reducing the trade deficit, boosting American manufacturing). We can disagree on those though and that's healthy.

    PS - almost all impeachments are partisan, at least of Presidents. The latest impeachment was the most bipartisan in history, in fact.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kevin, I have to add - I don't understand why you work so hard to defend Trump. He singlehandedly cost the Republican Party Georgia and the Senate Majority. He, more than any Democrat, gave them that victory. He cost them the House two years ago and likely kept them from taking it back. All he had to do was stop talking/tweeting and it's likely the Repubs would still have the Senate no matter what Dems did.

    Instead, he went on a full throated attack Republican elected officials of longstanding WHO SUPPORTED HIM, simply because they would not give up their fidelity to the Constitution and replace it with fidelity to him. He told his supporters that REPUBLICAN election officials were corrupt and their election was corrupt in a state Republicans had to win.

    Yet you blame all your ills on Democrats and try and deflect blame from Trump. That makes so little sense to me. If I were still a Republican I would be furious at the President and trying to clean my own house so that never happened again before I got mad at the Democrats. I don't understand why you're not.

    ReplyDelete
  4. P.S.S. I know you love sports. If there were ever an apt comparison, it's the 2020 GOP and the 1986 USFL. Trump took both down. Excellent book here on this history of the USFL:

    https://www.amazon.com/Football-Buck-Crazy-Crazier-Demise/dp/0544454383

    The downfall was led by Trump, who convinced the other owners to move to the fall by lying to them, bullying them, and making claims of success he just created out of whole cloth. All to benefit himself, as he wanted the NFL to let him have a team and would dump the USFL as soon as he could if the NFL would let him in. Even ended with a lawsuit filed against the NFL by Trump and an unprepared past his prime attorney that failed spectacularly primarily because the jurors couldn't stand Trump.

    Any of that sound familiar? Trump is only a part of the book, as it's about the USFL. I bought it without thinking of the Trump angle just because the USFL was cool briefly when I was a kid.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "I certainly am supportive of the vaccine the his operation Warp Drive delivered and which is currently being mismanaged by Democrat governors."

    That statement is indicative of the partisan desire to attribute EVERY good thing to my politician/team, and EVERY bad thing to the other side, but usually the reality is more complex and varied. For example, from today's WSJ, not exactly a bastion of Democratic thought:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-vaccine-leaders-waited-months-to-approve-distribution-plans-11610737935

    ReplyDelete