WWRD - What Would Reagan Do?
The View from the
Middle
In the wake of the crisis in
Ukraine, I have constantly heard the question, “What would Ronald Reagan do now?”
asked by news people. The point that
these questioners are trying to make is that, given the circumstances as they
exist today in Ukraine, former President Reagan would not be able to do
anything differently.
The first point I have to make is
that this assumption is easy to make and impossible to defend. It’s like arguing that Mike Tyson could beat
Mohammed Ali, even in Ali’s prime. It is
a fun exercise, but in the end it is a meaningless debate.
The second point that must be made
is that this is an inappropriate question to begin with. It assumes that President Reagan would even
be in the same situation. It suggests
that simply because President Obama has painted himself into this geo-political
corner, that Ronald Reagan would have done the same thing. So, the question isn’t “what would Reagan do
once he painted himself into a corner”, it should be “how would Reagan have avoided
it”, and there are many things that would suggest that he would have.
Reagan’s overarching foreign policy
doctrine was “Peace through Strength”.
And when he said “strength” he meant both economic and military might. Reagan proved his resolve to act and to act
unilaterally in Granada and by sticking a missile in Gaddafi’s ear in
Libya. This sends a certain message to
our enemies and even to our allies that might deter aggression.
Reagan also believed in the importance
of economic strength. We literally spent
the Soviet Union into submission, but that was possible because we had the economic
power and flexibility to do so. The
Reagan economy was exploding. Federal
revenues were booming, and although our deficits were high for my taste, our
total debt was only one sixth of what it is today.
The bottom line – we had economic
vigor and that was something that our adversaries had to consider and our
allies could lean on, and that’s important.
Even Hillary Clinton and Admiral Mike Mullen (retired Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs) recently admitted that our debt and deficits might be the biggest
threat to our national security that we have.
So the question should be “could Ronald
Reagan have avoided this entire situation in the Ukraine through his Peace
through Strength strategy?” This will be
impossible to prove conclusively, but we all have the freedom to think for
ourselves and speculate. At least ask
yourself the question – do you think the Obama doctrine is working? Actually, what IS the Obama Doctrine?
The President hasn’t shared his
foreign policy strategy with me, but let me share what I believe it is based on
his actions:
1.
Do nothing (as witnessed by his approach in
Egypt, Syria, Iran and now the Ukraine).
2.
Then “stuff” will happen. It is the world after all and even if we do
nothing, some good things and some bad things will happen.
3.
Then, finally, take credit for all the good
things and blame all of the bad thinks on someone else.
Every country in the world is looking
for other countries to partner with, and they want partners who are strong,
consistent and steadfast. Our foreign
policy should be about making America the partner of choice.
Also, we must remember that America
wins in a “free” world. When countries
are allowed to strive and compete in a free market, everyone wins, but America
flourishes. A free market is our
“wheelhouse”. So, in addition to the
fact that liberty is just, America has this selfish reason for wanting the
world to be free.
Has our debt and our plodding economy
limited our choices to react to critical situations around the world? If we had been more proactive in Egypt, could
we have avoided the whole Morsi debacle?
If we had gotten involved earlier in Syria to support the early,
pro-Western rebels, could we have prevented the chaos that exists there now and
saved hundreds of thousands of lives at the same time? Did our eventual hesitation in places like
Egypt, Syria, Iran and Ukraine make us look less steadfast to our friends and
allies?
It’s impossible to go back in time
and correct all of these issues so that we can see how an economically stronger
and more consistent America might have changed world events today. However, common sense should tell us that we
would have more secure allies, more respectful foes, and we would have painted
ourselves into fewer corners.
No comments:
Post a Comment