Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Don't Be Deceived

 

It saddens me that I have to continue to remind my readers about the duplicitous nature of our government and its leaders and the media.  About two years ago, I wrote an article entitle “How Can I Lie to Thee, Let Me Count the Ways”.  It was about how politicians and journalists (so called) can distort the truth through lies of omission, exaggeration and even “in your face” boldface lies.  Well, last week there a couple of whoppers that you need to be informed about.

First, Joe Biden got on national TV and tried to tell the country that there was “Zero” inflation in July.  For the naysayers, let me quote him exactly.  He said, “I just want to say a number: Zero.  Today, we received news that our economy had 0% inflation in the month of July.”  That, of course was not true.  Just a few minutes before, it was announced that we experienced 8.5% inflation in July.  But then Joe confused his audience even further by trying to explain his claim.  He went on to say, “Here’s what that means.  While the price of some things went up, the prices of others things went down by the same amount.  The result?  Zero inflation last month.” 

What he didn’t tell you was that was a month to month comparison, and that is NOT how economists measure inflation.  Inflation is measured by comparing the current month’s prices to the same month in the previous year.  And THAT number was 8.5%, another almost 40 year high.  He also didn’t tell you that if you had done the same month-to-month comparison in June, you would have found a 17.2% increase.  I don’t remember him touting that number last month.  Plus, after a huge month-to-month gain like that, is it right to be bragging about a monthly result that was just as bad?  Either Joe doesn’t understand the fundamentals of our economy or he is trying to deceive a small number of people who will hear his claim of ZERO inflation and not question it.  Either way, it speaks poorly of the President’s grasp of the issue or his honesty.

Joe does, however, seem to have an affinity for the word Zero.  Remember, last year he claimed that his $3.5 Trillion Build Back Better bill would cost us “Zero”.  Unfortunately for Joe, the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) and fact checkers found that claim to be totally false.  Not only would it have to be paid for by increasing taxes, but it would also add hundreds of billions of dollars to our nation’s debt.  Beware of politicians who suggest that their programs won’t cost you anything.

The other “whopper” of the week was told by our Attorney General, Merrick Garland.  When speaking of the raid on Donald Trump’s home at Mar-A-Lago, Garland said that he and the FBI do not make decisions like this lightly, and that, “where possible, it is standard practice to seek less intrusive means as an alternative to a search, and to narrowly scope any search that is undertaken.”  Now, what he said might be true, and by making that statement he is suggesting that is exactly what he and the FBI did in this particular case, but that is not at all true.

First of all, he could have just attained a subpoena for the materials that he wanted.  That would have been “less intrusive”, but that is not what he did.  He obtained a search warrant, which was very public, with lights flashing and 30 armed FBI agents in the pitch darkness of the early morning in Florida.  Second, the warrant, which we have now seen, was not “narrowly scoped”.  This warrant allowed FBI agents to search any room in his home not occupied by other people and to take “any governmental and / or Presidential records created between January 20/2017 (Trump’s inauguration day) and January 20/2021 (Biden’s Inauguration day).  This allowed 30 agents to search every room or other buildings for eight hours (a total of 240 man-hours).  This search allowed them to forage through his safe and Melania’s closet.  It also, somehow, included taking his passports.  I would not describe this as a “narrow scope”.  You can decide.  Don’t take Merrick Garland’s word for it.  Use your own judgement.

There have also been a couple more attempts at misdirection by this administration.  They just passed the “Inflation Reduction Act” by twisting arms in their own party and without a single Republican vote.  What an achievement!  (that is sarcasm) According to the CBO and many Democrats, including Bernie Sanders, this act will not have any impact on inflation.  In fact, there are hundreds of conservative economists who predict that this law will actually make inflation worse.  Don’t be deceived by the name.

Finally, Democrats will tell you that last night’s drubbing of Liz Cheney in the Wyoming primaries is a sign that democracy is under assault.  Actually, that is a sign that our democracy can work as designed.  The people of Wyoming voted her out of office because she is engaged in an obsession with Donald Trump and not working on the needs and desires of the Wyoming citizens.  Don’t believe the misdirection.  This is exactly how our democracy is supposed to work.  The power is in the hands of the people, not the press or the politicians.  Watch out for the deception as it will come in many forms from both DC and the media!!

8 comments:

  1. "First of all, he could have just attained a subpoena for the materials that he wanted."

    A subpoena is used when you're seeking documents in an open proceeding. There is no open case (not investigation, actual case). So this talking point is wrong, a subpoena was not available.

    "with lights flashing and 30 armed FBI agents in the pitch darkness of the early morning in Florida."

    FBI agents, and most LEOs, are almost always armed, and so that's not particularly surprising that they are when they serve a warrant. They also typically serve at inopportune times for the target, so the target does not see them coming. Especially when the target has refused to cooperate and has a history of destroying documents, as Trump does.

    "This allowed 30 agents to search every room or other buildings for eight hours (a total of 240 man-hours)."

    Yes, when you take top secret documents from the US government, they tend to get a warrant to search every nook and cranny where they are. None of this is surprising.

    "It also, somehow, included taking his passports."

    This turned out to be false.

    "Use your own judgement."

    Anyone whose judgement includes even a bit of knowledge of the criminal justice system knows what happened is very standard, with the only difference being two things, which are related. First, the target was a former President who had kept classified documents, which is stunning in itself. Second, because he was a former President, he was given the opportunity to return the documents but did not.

    " The power is in the hands of the people, not the press or the politicians."

    The power is in the hands of the people, but barely. The people booted Donald Trump out of office. He then engaged in a multi-month fundraising and coup exercise designed to overturn the will of the people, despite knowing it was baseless.

    His followers continue to spread his lies today, and most of his party is so scared of him they cannot admit it was a lie.

    It's a sad state of affairs for a once great party that stood for more than fear of a retired NYC socialite and reality TV star. And yet, here we are. It's a weird place for those of us who were Republicans 20 or 30 years ago. Can you imagine a man like Bob Dole bending the knee to a carnival barker like Donald Trump?



    ReplyDelete
  2. As for the rest, isn't it nice to be debating the benefits of policies pro and con? It's been almost a decade since we've had this many bills affecting this many people's lives passed. One may agree with parts and disagree with other parts, but it's nice to see a Congress and Administration actually doing things, even if I may not like all of them.

    Hopefully it motivates the formation of a new, truly conservative party to push back. America needs the push and pull of policy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We'd all be better off if Congress did nothing vs. passing bills like the so called Inflation Reduction Act. They even lied about the title of it. Pitiful.

      Delete
    2. I can buy that argument to an extent. Yet states like ours rely so heavily on federal money we'd lose more than the self sufficient ones (usually the blue ones). So as an Arkansan, I want Congress busy.

      Delete
  3. Correction to the above - there was a grand jury subpoena, so it had gone past mere investigation. Trump did not return all documents as requested. Hence the warrant. May also have been some worry about him destroying docs - we'll know when the affidavit for the search is released.

    Here's Trump's filing, which basically reads like a social media rant. Will be interesting to see how far it goes. I did like that he referred to himself as the GOP frontrunner for '24.

    chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.1.0.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  4. good article Kevin, Joe Biden is a corrupt liar, as is Merrick Garland

    ReplyDelete
  5. This article has not aged well, as is common with most defenses of Trump. We now know the government tried to get him to return classified docs for months, trying to make it as easy as possible ("just send them FedEx, if you'd like.") Then tried a subpoena, and he STILL wouldn't comply. The warrant was very much a last ditch effort after everything else was exhausted.

    Of course, it's ridiculous an ex-President absconds with the documents in the first place. Much less fails to secure classified documents in a place with as poor security as Mar-a-lago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh man, all Trump had to do was stay quiet and return the documents. Not file a bunch of legal gibberish using inexperienced counsel, just shut up, collect his money from the suckers, and stay quiet. But he couldn't. And now:

      https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1564821619419267072?s=20&t=NA0_s3ufZoR0k7k6GqJ0dg

      Delete