Republican
Debate/Food Fight
The View from the Middle
Charles Krauthammer called the
Republican debate a “cage fight”. My
first impression was that it reminded me of the food fight scene in the movie
Animal House. I always feel comfortable
when I roughly align with Charles. I guess
our only difference is that Charles would describe it as “bloody” while I am
calling it “slimy”.
There were some clear winners,
however, and they were the candidates that were able to avoid the cafeteria
when the jello and mashed potatoes went flying.
Ben Carson was his usual calm self.
I have to admit, I really like this guy.
I like his “everyone should have skin in the game” tax plan. It’s not perfect, but it's good, and I
really like Ben’s mission to attack political correctness and take common sense
positions on things like “free” college, which he did in this debate.
John Kasich won by continuing to
develop his position as a compassionate uniter with a moderate platform. While all six candidates had good answers to
the question of whether replace Judge Scalia, I think Kasich’s was best. He recognized President Obama’s right to make
a nomination, but suggested that would further divide the country and intimated
that the President should put the country first (for a change) and not submit a
nominee.
Kasich also has a very centrist
view on immigration. His plan includes
securing the boarder and a path to legalization (not citizenship) after paying
fines and or back taxes. I think John’s
finest moment, however, was when he warned that the Republicans are flirting
with losing the general election in November if they didn’t stop the verbal
bludgeoning right now. I agree with him.
But the big winner of the night was
the third candidate to avoid a pie in the face, and that was Marco Rubio. Marco came across as articulate,
knowledgeable and composed. He was
actually able to dip into the food fight for a brief moment to point out Ted Cruz’s
inconsistency on immigration, but popped back out fast enough to avoid even a
splash of vittles on his suit.
Senator Rubio even came to the
defense of George W. Bush twice, even saying that he “thanked God” that George
Bush was President on 9/11. This should
insolate him from attacks by Jeb Bush in the future. Slick move!
He invoked Ronald Reagan in both name and spirit. He did this in spirit by avoiding personal attacks
on his Republican opponents. He actually
named Reagan as the man he would love to seek counsel from if he became
President. He said he would ask Reagan
how he inspired and united the country to lift us out of the mess he inherited
from President Carter. This was Rubio’s
finest moment.
The remaining three candidates were
co-losers. Trump, Cruz and Bush spent so
much time denigrating each other that they managed to damage themselves and
blur whatever message they intended to convey to the audience. They reminded me of three drowning men taking
each other down as they tried to save themselves. If they don’t stop this grade-school
playground strategy, they will not only watch their own fates sink in a quicksand
of their own making, but they could destroy their party’s chance at the White
House altogether. Congratulations!
Love this synopsis! I agree wholeheartedly.
ReplyDeleteWhat a wise daughter you are.
ReplyDelete