Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Biden Becomes Republican's Critic & Counselor

 

During his first press conference of 2022, Joe Bidden turned into a chief counsel for the Republican Party.  He started by accusing Republicans of not standing for anything and just being against everything, the party of “NO”.  It is an easy claim to make in front of a friendly media corps, especially when he would get no push back because he didn’t take any questions.  If he had been in a debate, he would have been crushed by his Republican opponent who would have delivered a long list of tantalizingly good policies they plan to pursue.  Joe also, unwittingly, revealed the Democrat plan to try to hold on to the House and Senate in the 2022 midterms.  They plan to paint the Republican Party as the party of no.  This gives plenty of time to prepare their campaign.  It’s the equivalent of giving Tom Brady two minutes and three timeouts in the fourth quarter to deliver a field goal to win the game.

There are actually a number of bills Republicans (conservatives) should not only talk about, but promise to pass and put on Joe’s desk in 2023.  Newt Gingrich’s 1994 Contract with America included 10 pieces of legislation that he would bring up if and when Republicans were at the helm.  He used the contract to position his party as the party that was fiscally responsible, pro-police and anti-criminal, and for welfare reform and lower taxes.  Newt’s Contract with America gained 54 seats in the House and 10 seats in the Senate and flipped both the House and the Senate from Democrat to Republican majorities which they maintained for the next 12 years. Interestingly, some of those issues are still important even today, but there are, in my opinion at least four areas that conservatives should focus on for 2022, and do so publicly and nationally.

Amazingly, I believe one of the biggest issues in this next election will be border security.  While President Trump made this a big issue in 2016 and did deliver much of his wall, it is clear that there is more to be done.  I believe the wall needs to be completed in strategic areas but given the record two million apprehensions and an estimated 600,000 got-aways this year it shows that the wall is not enough.  We need more technology and boots on the ground, but we must also eliminate “catch and release” and other incentives to cross illegally.  This is still a huge issue with Americans and even 50% of Hispanic Americans favor a secure border.

Any discussion on border security, however, should include a promise to address the millions of people still living here illegally.  According to Pew Research, 74% of Americans favor giving legal status for children brought here by their parents without their knowledge or consent (the DACA persons).  I believe we should offer them a path to citizenship, but whatever border security legislation becomes part of this new contract it needs to address hard working Hispanic Americans that are still living in the shadows in America.

Another plank for this new contract needs to be a pro-police, anti-crime piece of legislation.  While much of law enforcement is controlled at the state and local levels, there is still much that the federal government can to do help.  Interestingly enough, this was also a part of the Newt’s contract with America back in 1994.  The original contract promised more federal money that could ONLY be used to put more police on the streets and required harsher penalties for violent crimes.  The same could and should be promised today.

Next, the contract needs to be a pro-parent document.  Between local school boards and the Biden administration, parents today are under attack.  Two things finally put a spotlight on this issue.  First, the pandemic forced children into remote learning and parents finally saw for themselves what was being taught in schools and were shocked.  Then, Glenn Youngkin made parents’ rights a key topic of discussion in the Virginia Governor’s race.  He sided with parents vs the teachers’ unions and he won.  Then, Merrick Garland, Biden’s Attorney General, created a special task force to investigate parents who attended school board meetings at the behest of the NSBA (National School Boards Association).  This drew the line of demarcation in this battle.  The Democrat party was siding with the campaign money provided by teachers’ unions, and Republicans have chosen parents.  While money will always be important for politicians, there are WAY more parents in this country than teachers and I believe Republicans will be on the right side of history here.

Finally, Republicans should grasp the mantle of fiscal responsibly and promise to balance the budget and stop piling mountains of debt on to the backs of our children.  They are the ones who will have to pick up the tab for today’s mindless spending.  And I disagree with Nancy Pelosi who famously said that, “we don’t have a spending problem” in America.  She suggested that our government can tax its way out of our fiscal problems.  To cure our deficit spending disease, we will have to make some tough spending reduction decisions on discretionary spending like Defense and the size of government and even mandatory spending like Social Security and Medicare.  These cuts, however, are not just good ideas, they are unavoidable.

There could be other planks to this new Contract with America, but the important thing is that the Republican Party needs to become the party of promise, hope and action and not just the party of “no”.

23 comments:

  1. Simple blocking and tackling. If Republicans don’t win control of both Houses in 2022, not much will change. If they win control, they need to Impeach Biden and Harris for blatant criminality. The Border Crisis is an Intentional violation of Law. Not hard to find grounds for Impeachment…Just Do It!
    Next, overturn as much of the Democrat spending as possible. Be responsible. Claw back the funds before they get passed out to the Democrat faithful. Republicans can’t tip toe through the tulips trying to avoid anyone getting mad. They need to get as mad as the people who elect them and go to war against waste and for America. Helping hands are fine when really needed, but handouts must stop. What do Republicans have to loose? The next election? If Americans are that stupid, they deserve what they get. It’s up to “We the People”…not the people we elect to represent us. Vote for change, and demand it! Bob I.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said, Bobby. It's always good to have a literal genius on my side!! YTM!!

      Delete
    2. Curious Kevin - what is the "blatant criminality" which would justify impeachment?

      I do find it humorous that even now the GOP base believes Republicans will overturn any of that spending. They're literally out there doing photo ops for the projects being funded by that spending they didn't vote for!

      Delete
  2. Education reform will likely be my #1 deciding factor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a big one. You have "choice" because you have the resources, but why shouldn't everyone? I'm with you Paiger!

      Delete
    2. This is a great issue relevant only to Pulaski County and the wealthier sections of NWA. Beyond that it's a killer for Arkansas education.

      Delete
  3. "Next, overturn as much of the Democrat spending as possible. Be responsible. Claw back the funds before they get passed out to the Democrat faithful."

    You have clearly not been paying attention to anything the Republican Congress and Presidents have been doing the last two decades at least.

    It's amazing to me after all this time there are people who still think the GOP wants to restrain spending. Triumph of hope over experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So we are asking for them to return to their core principles. Dems core principles are big spending, big government and limiting speech to what they believe in. You think that's any better?

      Delete
    2. Who is the "we" that is asking this? The GOP members who are fighting for the classically core principles of the Party have just been censured.

      Do I think Dems core principles of government spending, government solution and "limiting speech" (huh?) are better?

      Yes, those are better than the GOP principles of overturning elections, big spending, big government, and selling your party's principles out to any celebrity who comes along and promises to "own the libs."

      I don't like either of them, but the latter is exponentially worse than the former, because at least the former believe in SOMETHING.

      Delete
  4. "Between local school boards and the Biden administration, parents today are under attack."

    This framing is both bad for America and wrong. It makes me very sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, sad but true when the NASB refers to parents as terrorists. That is sad.

      Delete
    2. NSBA has nothing to do with the Biden Administration. It's a separate organization that some local school boards. And it did not refer to parents as terrorists. Again, the rightwing clickbait "news" has led you astray.

      Here's the letter. What it specifically says is:

      "As these acts of malice, violence, and threats against public school officials have increased, the classification of these heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes."

      I think we can all agree that a parent who issues threats of violence against school personnel deserves our scorn, though the NSBA's "terrorism" language MAY be overwrought. One can forgive a lobbying organization a little overreach in trying to protect its members.

      Delete
    3. Forgot to link the letter: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21098209-nsba-letter-to-president-biden-concerning-threats-to-public-schools-and-school-board-members-929211?responsive=1&title=1

      Delete
    4. In light of this report, really not seeing the problem with a national association for school boards sending letters about threats to its members. Do you Kevin?

      https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-education-threats/

      Delete
  5. "They plan to paint the Republican Party as the party of no."

    Given the GOP has explicitly stated that when they're out of power, they want to be known as the party of "no" this shouldn't be all that surprising. When they're in power they're the party of big spending and deficits and not much else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt, I don't understand you. I'm saying the Dems are no better and probably worse, and I'm suggesting that Republicans return to their core principles. Can't you even agree with that?

      Delete
    2. That's not what your quote says at all. It says the Dems plan to "paint the Republican Party as the party of no." All I'm stating, correctly, is that they don't have to "paint" the GOP as that. The GOP proudly admits to it.

      Delete
    3. there needs to be an adult in the room to tell the libs no. We can't keep spending money like drunk sailors.

      Delete
    4. Agreed, there does need to be such an adult. You just won't find them in the GOP.

      Delete
  6. Why do we limit ourselves to the confines of past behavior (from both major parties)? Why not demand “new” solutions, fiscal responsibility, and standards of conduct that are lawful, courageous, and consistently applied to everyone (regardless of party affiliation)? If we can’t imagine it…pray for it…and trust God to help us achieve it…we are doomed to a repetitive spiral of failure and finger pointing. I’ve stated where I stand…and it is not Republican or Democrat. It is American. What say you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldn't have said it better myself, Bobby! YTM

      Delete
    2. True. And we won't get it by repeating the national parties' same old partisan warfare distraction BS. We get it by finding and supporting new leaders from new places and rejecting those who engage in the same old/same old.

      Delete
    3. If we want something new, it is a good argument for term limits for all congressmen, both Senators and Reps.

      Delete