The View from the Middle
The verdict is in for Kyle Rittenhouse – not guilty on all counts. Some are celebrating, and some are disappointed. Some are even angry. I personally am none of those things. I guess you could say that I am reflective. I am hoping that everyone in this great country can learn a lesson from this entire experience.
For Kyle Rittenhouse, I am hoping that he and those like him have learned that showing up at violent riots with a gun strapped to your back is not a good idea. This time, he was lucky. He wasn’t killed back in August of last year, and he is not going to spend the rest of his life in jail. If there was ever to be a “next time”, he might not be so lucky. Trying to replace authorized and trained law enforcement officers is, at best, unwise and at worst criminal.
If you are an angry, violent person who wants to take advantage of a chaotic situation to let off steam and destroy property, don’t do it. I doubt that Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz even knew who Jacob Blake was. They weren’t “protestors”, they were rioters. The lesson people like them should learn is that violent situations, even those of your making, can turn on you in an instant with tragic results. Take your meds and stay at home and watch it on TV.
For the mainstream media who has forgotten their role in our society, don’t convict before the actual trial takes place. Afterwards, you are all trapped into defending your pre-trial condemnations. This will placate some, anger others and continue to slowly evaporate your viewership as your constituencies get tired of the anger and divisiveness you promote.
Politicians should learn a similar lesson in terms of prejudging any trial and then being trapped into justifying their premature missteps. They have an additional responsibility to protect The Constitution of The United States, which they vowed to defend. Inaccurate public statements absolutely defile the concept of due process, and the fact that it comes from people elected to protect it is extremely disappointing. Politicians! Hold your tongues and do your job to advocate for due process and promote the concept that Americans on trial are “innocence until proven guilty”.
And finally, and most importantly, I hope our federal, state and local governments learn that they cannot relinquish their responsibility to protect the lives and property of their constituencies. As I stated in my last article, when they do, they create a void that will be filled by an unsanctioned and unqualified crowd on one side and an out of control, violent and angry mob on the other side. The damage, injury and death that results is on their heads. Some of those things will happen no matter how effective law enforcement is, but an absolute abdication of that responsibility will only serve to maximize it.
The final lesson is for all of us. 12 people (seven women, five men and one person of color) listened to all of the evidence, deliberated for four days and unanimously delivered this verdict. We can agree or disagree. We can debate and discuss, but we must do so respectfully and then honor this jury’s decision.
Great post. You sound remarkably like Joe Biden in it!
ReplyDeleteA compliment and an insult in the same comment. Interesting. If you think this was a great post, I think you need to re-read the Rush to Judgement article.
ReplyDeleteI will, however, have a great day, savoring your first positive comment on one of my blogs, and I am being serious! Thanks.
Not an insult at all. It's refreshing when intelligent people across the political spectrum agree on something. Helps take the temperature down.
ReplyDeleteLike this: https://twitter.com/nbcsnl/status/1462289935923388416?s=20
lol there's no way Joe Biden could have articulated a well thought out article / response like Kevin's
ReplyDeleteand I believe Biden called Rittenhouse a white supremacist. His crazy rambling words have no resemblance to what Kevin has written here.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet he's already gotten passed more substantive legislation than Donald Trump and the GOP did in 4 years. Crazy given he's so incompetent.
Deleteif you call adding trillions of dollars to our national debt for frivolous spending substantive legislation that would be correct. Kevin says you are a libertarian? how on earth can you support the liberal democrats right now?
ReplyDeleteWell, if we're not calling adding trillions of dollars to the national debt an accomplishment then I guess the Trump era had exactly zero accomplishments, because the tax cut bill is out!
DeleteI don't view, say, broadband for rural areas in our rural state as "frivolous." Anymore than a host of other federal spending programs that allow people to live in this poor, rural state are. Arkansas is a federal welfare state, meaning we take in far more in federal dollars than we pay out. So federal spending generally benefits us greatly.
The main reason I can support any Democrats at all is because the opposing party no longer believes in constitutional democracy. I'm out here hoping for an actual conservative party will eventually emerge, either through a complete flushing of the current GOP down to the statehouses and then rebuild, or a viable third party. Right now the latter looks more likely. Either way, I'll take the party that believes in democracy, even if they don't exercise their constitutional power in the way I want, over the party that is controlled solely by the whims of a NYC socialite and reality TV star with little understanding or appreciation for our Constitution. That's not a difficult choice at all.