The Choice No Woman Wants to Make
The View from the Middle
While I never suggest Bill Clinton as a moral role model and I frequently
question his motives, I find myself more and more often in support of his
fiscal and even social policies. In 1997
Bill Clinton said that abortion should be safe, legal and rare. I think this
captures the heart of America and should be our official position on this
important issue. Unfortunately, we have
all been distracted by the extremists in both political parties and consequently
have made no progress in this area. The left wants abortion on demand and the
far right has a no tolerance approach without an exception for rape or incest. While I believe life begins at conception,
even I would be conflicted if the rape victim were my daughter.
As these two sides battle, we have experienced over 54 million abortions
in the US since Roe v. Wade in 1973. Today,
we abort 1.2 million lives per year vs. just 200,000 in 1970. According to the CDC, that is more than the
lives ended annually by heart disease and cancer, the top two killers in the US
– combined. It’s time we looked for common ground for the sake of women
everywhere and for the yet unborn.
Some would argue that a woman has the right to do whatever she wants
with her own body. Of course, that isn’t
true. If a woman decides to fill her
body with alcohol and then drive a car, she begins to infringe on the rights of
others. Others would say abortion is between
a woman and her doctor. Unfortunately, that isn’t true either. When a man and woman conceive a child, a new
person is created instantly. This new
person has a new and unique DNA that has never existed in the history of the
world and will never exist again. When a
woman decides to have an abortion, she is infringing on that new person’s right
to life, which is the first right enumerated in our Declaration of
Independence.
The life of the mother is also better off without an abortion. There are huge risks for women during and
after an abortion. Surgical risks include
pelvic infection, heavy bleeding, perforation of the uterus, cervical injury,
heart attack and death. Then there are psychological risks even after a successful
surgery. Women who have abortions are
six times more likely to commit suicide than women who give birth. They are also more likely to experience
anxiety, depression, fear of exposure and eating disorders. Many believe that there is also a significant
increase in the risk of breast cancer. Given
these facts, I would love to hear the argument that the world needs more
abortions. So, if we all agree that we
should have fewer abortions, how do we get there?
First, we need to consider the number one provider of abortions in the
US, Planned Parenthood. In 2010 they
performed almost 330,000 abortions and executed a whopping 841 adoption
referrals. Since the government
(actually you and me) gave them 487 million dollars in that same fiscal year,
we could incent them to reduce the number of abortions they perform or lose
that support. They could do this easily
by using their facilities to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies through
education and by increasing the number of adoption referrals by honestly
discussing all of the options available to the pregnant women they serve. We should set a goal for them to reduce their
abortions by 10% a year for the next five years as a requirement to get
continued funding. Personally, I would
be willing to give them even more money if they were able to achieve these
goals.
Second, our black leaders are righteously indignant about the fact that
38% of our prison population is African American while they only represent 13%
of the overall population. When it comes
to abortion, however, the statistics are even worse, but black leadership is
stunningly silent. According to the CDC,
over 40% of abortions are performed on black women and about one half of all
black pregnancies end in abortion. Where
is the outcry, and where is the plan to address this terrible inequity. Black leaders should commit to cut this number
in half over the next five years. This
would still represent an imbalance but will save the lives of over 250,000
black children along the way.
Finally, did you know that over 45% of abortions are performed on women
who have already had at least one, and 8% are for women who have had three or
more? Could a national advertising
campaign, proclaiming the preciousness of life and exposing the perils of
multiple abortions, reduce these numbers by even 5% a year? If these three strategies were pursued, in
five years we could save 500,000 innocent lives and cut our current annual pace
almost in half. It will take commitment
and resolve as a nation, but if one life is precious what value do we put on
half a million?
No comments:
Post a Comment